number of participants

number of participants

by Anja Weber -
Number of replies: 2
Picture of E-internship Program Committee Picture of Steering Committee Picture of Sus-TF Project Sustainability Strategy Picture of TF Career Guidance Picture of TF Entrepreneurial Mindset Picture of TFI HE e-internship for Higher Education Picture of TF Intercultural Dialogue & Civic Participation Picture of TFI Y e-internship for youths Picture of TF-TL Transformative Learning Picture of TF Twin Transition

Dear all,

after our meeting yesterday Marko brought up a very valid question - how can we offer meaningful mentoring to large groups of participants. To be honest, I hadn't done the math of our program yet in a way, where it makes practical/technical sense. We discussed different options and here are my thoughts:

we have to serve 2500 participants in 2 years, who all have to go through a 6 weeks program. How such a program could be structured is laid out in the framework draft. That means, annually, we have to put 1250 participants through the program. Originally, the proposal mentions two batches per year. That would still be over 600 participants per batch. Even in virtual meetings, that is not possible. 

If we say that a batch cannot have more than 120 participants, we would need to run the program 10 times per year, that would be 60 weeks continously. A year only has 52 weeks, so that is also not an option. 

The only way to do this, is to break up every batch into several kohorts that run at the same time. Even then we will have to offer 3 batches per year. 

What do I mean by several kohorts at the same time? We offer the exact same content on 4 different time slots in a week. We open each slot for 105 participants and they have to choose which one suits them best and join that one. We could also have 2 for students, 1 for youths and 1 with French instructors. The content delivered is the same in each of the 4 sessions. However, to offer meaningful breakout sessions, we will need a good number of co-facilitators who also attend the mentor-lead session for support. I would say at least 4, to offer 5 breakout rooms @ 21 participants each. That is the maximum for meaningful group work. 

For the company play that would mean the same. As those are schedules 4 times per week already, but only for 30 min each, I would suggest that the same session is offered consecutively 4 times on each of those 4 days (or even more often if we want smaller groups for the company play). That again means, we need either entrepreneurs who are willing to commit to 2 hours on 4 days per week for 6 weeks (which is unlikely), or we need a number of entrepreneurs. 

Here is the calculation again:

2500 participants in 2 years = 1250 participants annually

3 batches per year => 416 participants per batch, 4 kohorts per batch = 104 participants per kohort => 5 breakoutrooms per kohort @ 21 participants

What does that mean for us? Each team needs to identify members who are willing and able to commit to facilitate as mentors and attend as co-facilitators these sessions for 18 weeks over the next 2 years. We also all need to identify suitable entrepreneurs who we can bring on board for this. Some of us also need to attend the facilitator training for the simulation to assist the different teams during the simulation and possibly during their preparation for the competition. 

May be we can bring FOPs on board? Or colleagues at our institutions who want to integrate this program into their own courses? Let's talk about this next week! 

Greetings,

Anja

In reply to Anja Weber

Re:Next meeting

by Yitna Gebreab -
Picture of E-internship Program Committee Picture of Steering Committee Picture of TFI HE e-internship for Higher Education Picture of TF Intercultural Dialogue & Civic Participation Picture of TF RV Recognition & Verification Picture of TF Twin Transition

Dear Team,
As agreed, our next meeting  would be Wednesday, October 22, 2025, from 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. East African Time. 

Agenda 

  • Updates on preparations of Modules: 
  1. MOOC Module 1: Business Planning Basics / Business Model Canvas
  2. MOOC Module 2: Entrepreneurship in Rural Development
  3. MOOC Module 3: Sustainability & the SDGs
  4. MOOC Module 4: Project Design & Funding
  • number of participants

  • AOB

Please use the same meeting link as our usual sessions:
🔗 Join Zoom Meeting
https://hswt.zoom.us/j/4278250055?omn=98057317483

Passcode: 1iYYWj

Duration: 1hr

Looking forward to seeing you all then.

Best regards,

In reply to Anja Weber

Re: number of participants

by Eija Laitinen -
Picture of E-internship Program Committee Picture of Steering Committee

Dear Anja

Dear Marko

Dear All, 

Thank you Marko for raising this question, and thank you Anja for finding a proposal how to solve the issue of reaching out to massive student numbers.

I have been reading the message many times, because it just looks like this will be a super large training effort. Without doubt we will be able to complete it successfully with a lot energy and our capacity to organise the work. However, I believe we have an objective that this course to be used by others as well. Dragana had done so nice work by listing the expertise needed in the sessions. This made me really to see how multifaceted the course is - and raised the question that which kind of institution (especially an NGO) would be able to repeat it even if we have a teachers manual prepared. I mean if we expect the replication be hybrid also.  Who dares to start teaching with the teachers manual only? normally you have expertise on the topic, and then the manual supports you. 

Thus, allow me to ask this: would a complete online delivery of the e-internship be an option? Or does for example the project doc limit our choices? In online we could have mini lectures/videos (by avatars), and we could use free access learning tools. I am not expert of those, but I would assume there would be such tools available. The online module could be offered for free use of anyone, it would be easy to replicate by anyone who finds it useful. With a complete online delivery, it would be possible to develop a systematic structure, thus it would be easy for the participants. And we could have a diversity of avatars. There can be quizzes, literature, links to reading materials, to nice videos, etc.. to guide one's learning, and I would assume that it would also be possible to build in the socio-constructive learning elements so that the learning process would allow online contact to the other learners. 

I am a bit afraid that in the hybrid model we need to put in a lot of energy, and we will not necessarily produce anything sustainable to replicate. But if we put all our energy in producing a modern online course, it might be something unique and possible to use with thousands of more learners.  I assume we could pack the real life challenges also on videos, to be used many times. 

Unfortunately I cannot participate the next meeting, Jennifer can be there for a limited time. I wish good discussion on this. Together, the solution will be found. 

BR, Eija