Dear Dragana,
Thank you for the feedback — that is helpful and noted.
Regarding the video, it was created as a light, informal support piece mainly for use in discussions with potential Friends of the Project in South Africa, rather than as a final promotional or dissemination asset. The intention was simply to give a quick overview of the type of interaction and collaboration we are aiming to achieve through the project.
I agree that for wider dissemination or public-facing use, a more refined and visually aligned version would be beneficial, particularly in terms of consistency of flags, graphics, and messaging. My apologies for any confusion caused by the mixed visuals — no offence was intended. I have now changed the YouTube setting to private so that it is not shared further in its current form.
From my side, I am very happy to support with input on the simulation and experiential learning elements, while the development of a final dissemination/promotional video would likely sit more appropriately within the consortium’s communication activities.
Regarding the simulation licences, the key point is that the simulation works through active participation. Participants log into the platform, make business decisions, work in teams, and interact with other participants during the simulation process. Because of this, access to the system requires licences.
The licences provide access to:
- The simulation platform, (both delegates and facilitator platforms)
- Participant/team logins, (facilitator log-ins too)
- Simulation activities and decision rounds,
- Facilitated sessions and feedback.
The simulation is therefore different from a static content platform or online course. Its purpose is to create active interaction and collaboration between participants across institutions and countries. Without an interactive tool of this kind, the virtual exchange component would rely much more heavily on passive content rather than practical engagement between delegates.
The exact licence structure can also depend on the agreed implementation scope, for example:
- Expected participant numbers, 2500?
- Number of cohorts, I have 6 + 1 pilot now
- Delivery format, each partner still needs to decide this
- And the level of facilitator involvement required. How many do we have at present?
Once these elements are fully aligned at consortium level, the licensing structure and associated costs can be matched accordingly in a clear way.
I will also prepare a short overview for the next Steering Committee meeting so that everyone has a common understanding of how the simulation component is intended to operate within the project.
To answer your questions directly:
- Is it possible to use the platform without licences?
No. Participation in the simulation itself requires access to the platform via a licence/login. - Can participants access only certain parts or for a limited period?
Access can be structured in phases or around specific activities/cohorts, depending on the agreed project implementation. However, active participation in the simulation still requires licensed access. Maybe we can talk about this question because I am not 100% sure I have understood your question. - What do the licences include?
The licences provide access to:- The simulation platform,
- Participant/team logins,
- Simulation activities and decision rounds,
- Facilitated sessions and feedback,
- And the overall simulation delivery environment.
- How long are licences valid for?
For this project, the intention is that licences remain available for the duration of the agreed project activities linked to the relevant cohort or implementation phase.
I hope I have answered the questions but I am happy to discuss with anyone who needs any clarity.
Best regards,
Matt